Zineb Louh
via MarocDroit موقع العلوم القانونية http://www.marocdroit.com/A-lesson-to-the-USA_a3225.html
The United States is in an urgent need to understand the real significance of Human Rights. No, human rights do not mean a way to control the others. No, human rights do not mean a lie to deviate people from reality. No, human rights do not mean a weapon that one may use to threaten and intimidate the others. Dear United States human rights is
"commonly understood as inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being."
If there is no human being, so by definition, we cannot talk about their rights. Please for ones try to open your eyes and accept the reality. There is no more time left for games, the Moroccan Sahara issue needs to be solved urgently. There is a huge threat for the lives of the people in region and for the world. If you really care about human rights, then start by helping to save their lives rather that encouraging the establishment of a terrorist territory in the Europeans doors.
Presenting a resolution to the UN council asking to give the MINURSO power to control Human rights in the Moroccan Sahara, will not solve the problem, but it will create another one. By doing so, you will offend a historical US ally. You will violate the rights of the 35 million Moroccan by disrespecting their sovereignty in their country. You will hurt the first country that recognized the United States. You will destabilize the only stable country in the region. You will simply open a door for terrorists to get access to the Moroccan Sahara. Hence, one may ask what are the reasons for such a useless, offensive, and humiliating resolution?
Could it really be the RFK organization that is behind all of this? Can this small NGO, which is close to the power, create the biggest problem in the relations between two old friends and allies? We are talking security cooperation against terrorism, we are talking free trade agreement, and we are talking strong political relations, is the RFK organization more important than all of this? It is sad.
However, morocco will not remain silent. Morocco got the testimonies of several world leaders for being an exception in the region for all the efforts made through these last years. We have a constitution that was adopted by more than 90% of the population. We have a national council for human rights which is defending the Moroccan rights. And the more important thing, we have three different ethnics groups, Arabs, Amazighs and Hsaini, who are leaving in a total security in their country, so we will not allow anyone to touch our security. If terrorism is no more an issue for the US it is still a big one for the Moroccans and we will not allow it on our territories.
The Moroccan territories are a holly matter for its population, and no one has the right to touch them.
"commonly understood as inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being."
If there is no human being, so by definition, we cannot talk about their rights. Please for ones try to open your eyes and accept the reality. There is no more time left for games, the Moroccan Sahara issue needs to be solved urgently. There is a huge threat for the lives of the people in region and for the world. If you really care about human rights, then start by helping to save their lives rather that encouraging the establishment of a terrorist territory in the Europeans doors.
Presenting a resolution to the UN council asking to give the MINURSO power to control Human rights in the Moroccan Sahara, will not solve the problem, but it will create another one. By doing so, you will offend a historical US ally. You will violate the rights of the 35 million Moroccan by disrespecting their sovereignty in their country. You will hurt the first country that recognized the United States. You will destabilize the only stable country in the region. You will simply open a door for terrorists to get access to the Moroccan Sahara. Hence, one may ask what are the reasons for such a useless, offensive, and humiliating resolution?
Could it really be the RFK organization that is behind all of this? Can this small NGO, which is close to the power, create the biggest problem in the relations between two old friends and allies? We are talking security cooperation against terrorism, we are talking free trade agreement, and we are talking strong political relations, is the RFK organization more important than all of this? It is sad.
However, morocco will not remain silent. Morocco got the testimonies of several world leaders for being an exception in the region for all the efforts made through these last years. We have a constitution that was adopted by more than 90% of the population. We have a national council for human rights which is defending the Moroccan rights. And the more important thing, we have three different ethnics groups, Arabs, Amazighs and Hsaini, who are leaving in a total security in their country, so we will not allow anyone to touch our security. If terrorism is no more an issue for the US it is still a big one for the Moroccans and we will not allow it on our territories.
The Moroccan territories are a holly matter for its population, and no one has the right to touch them.
via MarocDroit موقع العلوم القانونية http://www.marocdroit.com/A-lesson-to-the-USA_a3225.html
ساهم في نشر الموضوع
0التعليقات :